GRADING CRITERIA

Grading Criteria

Digital Journaling Class 2012/13

Instructor: Jim DeCesare

Description:

Each assignment is assessed a numerical grade based upon the criteria listed below.  The instructor will review the assessment for each grading criteria when concerns over assignment grades arise.  Students will have the opportunity to improve assignment grades by addressing the areas that need improvement.  Only assignments handed-in on time will be eligible for resubmission (one week from grade posting).

Each objective is measured from 1-10.

9-10: Evidence of exceptional understanding.

7-8:   Adequate evidence of understanding.

4-6:   Minimal/moderate evidence of understanding.

0-3:   Minimal to no evidence of understanding.

__8__Minimum requirements described in the assignment were met.

__9__Visual elements were well design.

__6__Content was polished.

__9__Content was coherent.

__9__Student was productive. (not distracted by web-use during class-time)

__80____Grade

Comments:

John’s post was well thought-out, and carefully designed, but contained numerous grammatical errors.  Re-submission of post with grammatical corrections will result in an increased final grade.